← Back to all posts
News

ArtStation Hides Generative AI Art by Default and Requires Creators to Declare It

November 11, 2026 · 02:14 UTC · News
On this page 7 sections
ArtStation Hides Generative AI Art by Default and Requires Creators to Declare It

TL;DR

ArtStation turned on the second phase of its generative AI controls on Nov 9. Publishing or editing a project now answers a required question: was a generative AI program used, and how much. AI filtering is on by default, so work declared as primarily or mixed generative AI, plus anything tagged as created with AI, is out of feeds and search until each viewer changes a setting. A second filter for undisclosed AI starts at Strict and runs on community reports filed under a category named Potentially AI Slop. The portfolio platform for the game and film art world now defaults your AI-assisted work to invisible.


At a glance
What changed on Nov 9
3
declaration options, required on publish and edit
opt in
what mixed AI work now needs from every viewer
strict
default tolerance for suspected undisclosed AI
sep 2
NoAI training protection became the default
aug 10
KitBash bought ArtStation and Sketchfab
2022
the year ArtStation refused a default NoAI tag

What shipped

Three mechanisms. Declarations first: when you publish or edit a project, you pick primarily generative AI, mixed generative AI and non-generative methods, or 100% non-generative. The Terms of Service require you to be transparent about AI use, so the declaration is a form field with teeth, on paper anyway.

Filtering second. The default setting, Hide AI-generated content, removes every declared generative project, whether primarily or mixed, plus anything tagged as created with AI, from Community, Trending, Latest, Following, Artwork Search, Channels, and Search. Viewers can switch to allow mixed work, or hide nothing. Default settings are the product.

Reporting third. If you spot undisclosed AI, you report it under a category literally named Potentially AI Slop, the most honest string in the whole policy. Reports feed the filter; a single report labels and removes nothing.

How it works
From publish to filtered feed
Step 1
Declare
required question on every publish and edit
Step 2
Default filter hides it
declared and tagged AI drops from feeds and search
Step 3
Signals watch the rest
slop reports plus other signals score unlabeled work
Result
A default viewer sees none of it
mixed work returns only if that viewer opts in
Filter settings apply across Community, Trending, Latest, Following, Artwork Search, Channels, and Search.

Four years, one reversal

ArtStation spent four years on the other side of this argument. When it added the NoAI tag in December 2022, its own FAQ asked why NoAI was not the default and answered that the site did not want to "become a gatekeeper with site terms that stifle AI research and commercialization". In 2023 it shipped strictly opt-in filters for hiding AI artwork. For four years the line held: artists decide, the platform does not.

Then KitBash, the company behind KitBash3D and Greyscalegorilla, bought ArtStation and Sketchfab from Epic Games on Aug 10. On Sep 2, ArtStation made NoAI protection the default for new uploads, applied it retroactively to existing projects and profiles, and put Cloudflare bot management in front of known AI crawlers while ordinary search engines still index the site. That same post admitted the existing CreatedWithAI label and filters "are not enough to solve the problem" of AI work drowning out professional portfolios. Nov 9 is the follow-through.

artstation on ai :: from opt-in to default in four years dec 2022noai tagopt-in only 2023opt-in aifilters aug 2026kitbash buysartstation sep 2026noai defaultcrawler blocks nov 9ai hiddenby default source: artstation magazine announcements, dec 2022 to nov 2026
Phase two flips every default the platform defended in 2022.

How the strict filter works

The tolerance slider is the interesting engineering. Strict hides artwork when a few signals suggest AI; Balanced wants moderate signals; Loose wants strong ones. Signals combine community reports with other information, no single report decides an outcome, and the assessments stay private: no suspected-AI label on the work, no mark on the profile. Even the creator cannot see whether their piece is being suppressed. ArtStation's own remedy for false positives is to post process breakdowns, which doubles as visibility insurance.

Think of it as a spam filter for images. Reports are the mark-as-spam button, the slider is the aggression dial, and unlike your email inbox you never get to see the folder your work landed in.

Decision guide
Does a default viewer see your work?
What did you declare?
primarily generative AI
HIDDENuntil the viewer switches filtering off
mixed AI and hand work
OPT-IN ONLYhidden unless the viewer allows mixed work
100% non-generative
Enough slop signals against it?
no
VISIBLEthe default feed shows it
yes, at least a few
SUPPRESSEDstrict can hide it, with no notice to you

The catches

  • Declarations are self-reported. The Terms of Service require transparency, but the only enforcement path is the report queue.
  • False positives are the live worry. Creative Bloq notes that established artists like Loish have been falsely accused of AI use on other platforms, and that it is not yet clear whether artists get notified when work is filtered, or how they would contest it. Private assessments cut both ways: no public shaming, and no visible way to learn you were buried.
  • Strict is the default, and strict hides work when only a few signals suggest AI. For a painter with a loose, sketch-forward style, that is where false positives will live.
  • Brigading has a price tag: the help center warns that abusing reports can bring account actions.
  • Nothing here is banned. A viewer can set Don't Hide Generative AI Content and see everything. The opt-in audience for AI art is roughly the opt-in audience for ads.

Why it matters beyond ArtStation

Studios and recruiters browse ArtStation on default settings, so a filter that hides AI-assisted work changes hiring visibility, not just feed aesthetics. And the design is worth studying if you run any community site drowning in generated content: require a declaration at publish time, hide declared work by default, score the undeclared with crowd signals, keep the scores private, and punish report abuse. That is a coherent design. Its weak flank is appeal: private suppression with no creator-facing status has the same shape as the shadowban, and platforms that shipped those spent years apologizing for it.

If you build AI art tools, read it as a distribution fact. Your users' output now starts invisible on the industry's main portfolio site, and for primarily generative work there is no path back into a default feed at all. Expect AI-heavy portfolios to live on their own domains while the aggregator defaults to human-only.

Key Takeaways

  • ArtStation's Nov 9 update requires every project publish and edit to declare generative AI use as primarily generative, mixed, or 100% non-generative, with the Terms of Service demanding transparency.
  • AI filtering is on by default: declared and tagged generative work is hidden across Community, Trending, Latest, Following, Artwork Search, Channels, and Search unless each viewer opts in.
  • Suspected undisclosed AI is scored from community reports, filed as Potentially AI Slop, plus other signals, under a Strict-by-default tolerance slider. No single report decides, and assessments stay private, invisible even to the creator.
  • The policy reverses December 2022, when ArtStation refused to make NoAI the default rather than "become a gatekeeper", and follows KitBash's Aug 10 purchase plus the Sep 2 NoAI default and Cloudflare crawler blocking.
  • False positives are the weak point: strict hides on a few signals, and no notification or appeal flow is documented.
  • For AI tool builders: the game and film art world's main portfolio platform now defaults AI-assisted work to invisible. Assume opt-in-only audiences there.

Sources: ArtStation Magazine, More Transparency and Control for Generative AI (Nov 9, 2026), ArtStation Help Center, How Generative AI Declarations and Filters Work, ArtStation Magazine, ArtStation Should Put Artists First (Sep 2, 2026), ArtStation Magazine, NoAI Tagging on Projects (Dec 16, 2022), ArtStation Magazine, KitBash Acquires ArtStation and Sketchfab (Aug 10, 2026), 80 Level, Creative Bloq

AIArtStationAI ArtCreator RightsContent ModerationKitBashConcept ArtPlatform Policy
CONSOLE
$